Friday, November 27, 2009

Read More about VRS Indictments!

Want details about how the VRS agencies defrauded the government out tens of millions of dollars? Read the details at the link below. It goes into detail. More than just the overview that was published a couple of weeks ago.

http://deaftimes.net/index.php/news/article/64558/

What do you think should happen to the owners of these agencies? What about the Terps? What about the deaf people who made the fraudulent calls?




Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Why Doesn't the City Contract for Itself?

One of the pethora of questions we ask ourself is: WHY DOESN'T THE CITY SET UP IT'S OWN DATABASE OF TERP JOBS? The City of New York spends millions of dollars each year for ASL interpreters. (And should be spending more, since many of the Deaf are not receiving adequate service.) While the city -- and businesses -- tend not to complain about the lawyer fees they have to cover, they love to complain about what they spend on interpreter services. So why doesn't the city just set up a database of interpreting jobs and let interpreters fill the jobs charging their own fee. i.e. 50-70 dollars an hour for certs, as opposed to 70-90 an hour the agencies charge? This would save hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. So what's stopping them? Ideas?

Thursday, November 19, 2009

The Indictment ...


See the Indictment below. Very tough stuff. Lesson #1: If your VRS agency says something is legal that seems illegal ... follow your gut. The FCC spoke at the RID convention and basically said: If a fraudulent call comes in YOU THE TERP are liable. Report it to your bosses and REPORT IT TO THE FCC. (they, of course, didn't use the word "terp). It seems that whole part we got in training about being "dial tones" they didn't really mean. Anyway, read below. We wonder now if Sorenson will lift the blacklist against Viable Terps now that the indictments are in?


Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Twenty-six Charged in Nationwide Scheme to Defraud the FCC’s Video Relay Service Program
Arrests Made in Nine States

Indictments were unsealed today against 26 people charged with engaging in a scheme to steal millions of dollars from the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Video Relay Service (VRS) program, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division, Assistant Director of the FBI’s Washington Field Office Joseph Persichini Jr., Deputy Chief Postal Inspector Zane Hill, and FCC Chief of Staff Edward Lazarus.

Arrests were made today by FBI agents and Postal Inspectors in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon and Maryland, and were the result of a joint FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) and FCC Office of Inspector General (FCC-OIG) investigation into a nationwide scheme to defraud the FCC’s VRS program.

"The individuals charged in connection with today’s operation are alleged to have stolen tens of millions of dollars from an important government program that is intended to help deaf and hard-of-hearing Americans communicate with hearing persons," said Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division Lanny A. Breuer. "These defendants are alleged to have generated fraudulent call minutes by making it appear that deaf Americans were engaging in legitimate calls with hearing persons, when in reality, the defendants were simply attempting to steal money from an FCC program that is funded by every single American who pays their telephone bills. The Department of Justice will not stand by and let corporate executives and others line their pockets with money that should be used to help deaf Americans."

"Unfortunately, this remarkable service, designed to help those in need, also provided a growth opportunity for criminal activity that we believe has cost American consumers tens of millions of dollars," said Joseph Persichini, Jr., Assistant Director of the FBI’s Washington Field Office.

"When the U.S. Mail is used for the purposes of committing fraud, and in this case, a particularly insidious type of fraud, it’s the job of the Postal Inspection Service to aggressively investigate and ensure America’s confidence in the integrity of its postal system," said Deputy Chief Postal Inspector Zane M. Hill.

"Today’s events represent both a tragedy and an opportunity," said FCC Chief of Staff Edward Lazarus. "The tragedy is the unfortunate truth that a significant number of unscrupulous individuals, at great cost to the nation, have preyed on a very important program for delivering essential telecommunications services to persons with hearing disabilities. The ‘opportunity’ is the chance to reiterate our commitment to the VRS program and to follow through on efforts, already begun at the FCC, to safeguard the program against further waste, fraud, and abuse and to improve its delivery of VRS services to consumers."

The indictments allege that 26 individuals engaged in a scheme to defraud the FCC by submitting false and fraudulent claims for VRS calls, causing the FCC to reimburse the defendants at a rate of approximately $390 per hour. According to the indictments, VRS is an online video translation service that allows people with hearing disabilities to communicate with hearing individuals through the use of interpreters and Web cameras. A person with a hearing disability who wants to communicate with a hearing person can do so by contacting a VRS provider through an audio and video Internet connection. The VRS provider, in turn, employs a video interpreter to view and interpret the hearing disabled person’s signed conversation and relay the signed conversation orally to a hearing person. VRS is funded by fees assessed by telecommunications providers to telephone customers, and is provided at no cost to the VRS user.

The indictments charge owners and employees of the following seven companies with engaging in a scheme to defraud the FCC’s VRS program

  • Viable Communications Inc., of Rockville, Md.;
  • Master Communications LLC, of Las Vegas;
  • KL Communications LLC, of Phoenix;
  • Mascom LLC of Austin, Texas;
  • Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Interpreting Services Inc. (DHIS), of New York and New Jersey;
  • Innovative Communication Services for the Deaf Corp. (ICSD), of Miami Lakes, Fla.; and
  • Deaf Studio 29 of Huntington Beach, Calif.

Each of the indictments alleges that the defendants made, caused others to make, or processed fraudulent VRS calls that were then submitted to the FCC for reimbursement. These calls, often referred to as "r calls," "rest calls" or "run calls," served no purpose other than to generate call minutes that would be billed to the FCC’s VRS Fund.

In the first indictment, Viable Communications Inc. and four Viable executives have been charged with fraudulently generating VRS call minutes and obtaining reimbursements from the FCC for those calls. Viable owner and CEO John Yeh, 62, of Potomac, Md.; Viable Chief Operating Officer Joseph Yeh, 64, of Potomac; Viable Assistant Vice President Anthony Mowl, 25, of Rockville, Md.; and Viable Human Relations Director Donald Tropp, 25, of Rockville, have been charged in a six-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and to submit false claims; submitting false claims; conspiracy to commit mail fraud; and mail fraud.

In the second indictment, Master Communications, KL Communications and Mascom owners and employees have been charged with generating fraudulent VRS minutes. According to the indictment, these companies operated VRS call centers for Viable that generated and processed a large volume of fraudulent VRS calls, which were then submitted to the FCC’s TRS Fund Administrator for reimbursement. Master Communications, KL Communications and Mascom owner and employee Kim E. Hawkins, 46, of Las Vegas; Master Communications employee and KL Communications owner and employee Larry Berke, 62, of Phoenix; KL Communications employee Dary Berke of Phoenix; KL Communications and Master Communications employee Lisa Goetz, 43, of Phoenix; and Mascom Marketing and Advertising Director David Simmons, 43, of Austin; have been charged in a six-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and to submit false claims; submitting false claims; conspiracy to commit mail fraud; and mail fraud.

In the third indictment, DHIS owners and employees have been charged with generating and processing a large volume of fraudulent VRS calls. According to the indictment, DHIS operated VRS call centers for Viable that generated and processed fraudulent VRS calls. DHIS co-owners Irma Azrelyant, 47, of Basking Ridge, N.J., and Joshua Finkle, 41, of New York; DHIS video interpreter Natan Zfati, 31, of Brooklyn, N.Y.; DHIS bookkeeper Oksana Strusa, 35, of Jersey City, N.J.; DHIS video interpreter Alfia Iskandarova, 29, of Brooklyn; and DHIS video interpreter Hennadii Holovkin, 36, of Philadelphia; have been charged in a six-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and to submit false claims; submitting false claims; conspiracy to commit mail fraud; and mail fraud.

In the fourth indictment, ICSD owners and employees have been charged with generating and processing a large volume of fraudulent VRS calls. According to the indictment, ICSD operated VRS call centers for Viable that generated and processed a large number of fraudulent VRS calls. The indictment also alleges that ICSD owners and employees engaged in sham "marketing calls" for the stated purpose of marketing VRS services, but for the alleged true purpose of fraudulently generating additional VRS minutes. ICSD co-owners Yosbel Buscaron, 25, and Lazaro Fernandez, 35, both of Hialeah, Fla.; ICSD call center manager Wanda Hutchinson, 35, of Pembroke Pines, Fla.; ICSD call center manager Jessica Bacallo, 23, of Miami; and ICSD marketing manager Kathleen Valle, 23, of Miami; have been charged in a six-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and to submit false claims; submitting false claims; conspiracy to commit mail fraud; and mail fraud.

In the fifth indictment, defendants Benjamin Pena, Robert Z. Rubeck and Tamara Frankel have been charged with generating fraudulent VRS calls. According to that indictment, Pena was allegedly paid by Viable owner and CEO John Yeh to generate fraudulent VRS minutes. Also according to the indictment, Pena allegedly paid Rubeck and Frankel to make VRS calls for the purpose of generating those fraudulent minutes. Pena, 34, of Scottsdale, Ariz.; Rubeck, 34, of Surprise, Ariz.; and Frankel, 28, also of Surprise; have been charged in the six-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and to submit false claims; submitting false claims; conspiracy to commit mail fraud; and mail fraud.

Deaf Studio 29 owners and employees have been charged in a sixth indictment with generating fraudulent VRS calls. According to the indictment, Marc Velasquez Verson, Ellen Thompson and Doris Martinez allegedly organized and paid employees to use a particular VRS provider to make run calls. That provider would pay the defendants approximately 20 to 25 percent of the money the provider received from the FCC for the calls generated by the defendants. Velasquez, 56, of Oswego, Ore.; Ellen Thompson, 43, of Lake Oswego, Ore.; and Doris Martinez, 51, also of Oswego; were charged in the six-count indictment with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and to submit false claims; submitting false claims; conspiracy to commit wire fraud; and wire fraud.

All of the indictments seek criminal forfeiture from each of the charged defendants.

An indictment is merely an accusation, and defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

These cases are being prosecuted by Assistant Chief Hank Bond Walther and Trial Attorney Brigham Cannon of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, with the investigative assistance of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, USPIS and FCC-OIG.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

The Fire is ignited

I can't believe how many Terps are excited about the idea of organizing (not necessarily creating a union) and creating an interpreter BILL OF RIGHTS. If you haven't joined already we encourage you to join the yahoo group NYCInterpretersforum. The question on many people's mind is what organization is watching the back of Terps regarding working conditions? RID? Not really. RID seems to be focussed on keeping up the quality of interpreting. An admirable quest and we support that ... but we feel more needs to be done regarding working conditions. If agencies don't accurately tell you about a job or a client how will a Terp know if they are qualified to take that job? If an agency abuses a Terp by not providing a team for a two hour lecture then that hurts the interpretation. If an agency gets a monopoly in an area and then reduces wages so Terps have to leave the profession this hurts the profession. How do Terps fight this? Has Metro RID done anything yet? We haven't seen it, but we Welcome them in this fight. WE MUST BAND TOGETHER.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Paperwork Paperwork Paperwork

Of the myriad of issues we have with the various agencies in NYC is the way that each agency has a different requirement for paperwork and documentation. For some reason the worse an agency, the more paperwork they have. Why is this? Especially agencies that use a variety of names. You know the ones like Comprehensive Sign talking Bisexual How-much-can-we-rip-off-Terps agency. (Not that there's anything wrong with Bisexuals) But how often can an agency change their rules with the sole purpose of denying pay to Terps? Every day we run into another seasoned Terp who refuses to work with this agency. Which means the only people left working for them are newbie terps that don't know any better and don't mind being abused, or terps that are too scared to stand up. Which, come to think of it, includes most of us so far. When are we gonna say ENOUGH! We have the skills, the certifications, the talent ... why are we letting these agencies set the agenda and the ground rules?

Thursday, November 5, 2009

VRS and the Viable Curse

Among the things that RID has not adequately addressed so far ... if it ever will ... is the debacle facing VIs that were misfortunate enough to work for Viable VRS. This blog recently heard from one VI, who is now workind for the Mormon-owned SORENSON, that they have a policy to NOT HIRE ANY VI's who previously worked for Viable. This VI, who did in fact work for Viable, just left it off her resume. Now we think this SUCKS on the part of Sorenson. The fact is it wasn't the VIs that were allegedly committing fraud. The Viable VIs were processing calls the way they were taught by the company. They weren't profiting from the fraud. The people committing the fraud were the deaf consumers and the deaf owners. Is Sorenson refusing to process calls from the Deaf consumers who perpitrated the Viable fraud or the other companies that were named in the FCC case? Doubt it. We wonder if it's even legal for Sorenson to refuse to hire someone who worked for a particular company? We're not lawyers. Anyone know? Leave a comment. Also does anyone know whether the Sorenson owners donated to Prop 8?

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Communication between Terps

You'd think that people that make their profession understanding and transmitting messages would be better equipped to gather and relay information about their own lives and profession. But if you've terped as long as we have you know that Terp Gossip is about as accurate as two cans and a string ... but without the string ... or cans. In one piece of gossip ... or rather ... true fact, since it happened to one of us here in the Terp Sickofit offices (he he, she said office!) Seems one of the (formerly) leading Terp Agencies in the city -- who recently said they couldn't pay their terps -- are now sending out checks. We shall wait and see. Sad stuff, since they were once a great agency. The fact is we Terps are a gold mine. Why we don't open our own coop agency is beyond us. Or why we don't have a system like New Jersey. The Consumer pays less, the interpreters make more. Everybody is happy. What structure would work best? Leave a comment, and tell your friends about us. We want to get Terps Chirping!

Monday, November 2, 2009

What the hell is wrong with NYC Interpreting Agencies?

Okay, Terps. Here it goes. Can someone tell me what the hell is wrong with NYC interpreting agencies? We here at Terp Union have never seen such a sad sorry collection of miscreants, morons and criminals in all our 20-odd years of terping. From agencies not paying their Terps (probably because they need to pay their criminal lawyers first) to agencies taking 30 days to pay, to that beloved Brooklyn agency that makes new rules every 15 minutes so they can get out of paying their terps, including not allowing to double bill when a team doesn't show up ... or find ways they can get paid double while denying a terp their rightful cut. If we want to be able to have long term careers as Terps we need to protect ourselves. Not just monetarily, but our health. ASL terps are the number 1 industry to report job related injuries. (CTS etc) WE NEED YOUR HELP! Let us hear your stories from the battlefield. The point of this blog is to hear from all of us, so we can develop and spread the word about proper standard treatment of ASL Terps in the NYC area. We need to be united. While we're not saying we should all be paid the same, we should be aware what are the industry standards for pay in our field. Below are some possible points we think need to be emphasized, and please make suggestions to add to this ...

STANDARD PRACTICES

1. When a freelance terp is hired for a specific job at a specific location s/he and the client is a no-show, they can not be placed on another job which they did not previously accept. (Needs wording help here.)
2. If a team terp does not show up the solo terp will receive double pay if they so choose to terp the job alone.
3. 48 hours notice of cancellation, and if less than 48 hours FULL PAYMENT FOR EVERY HOUR SCHEDULED.


and .... (Make some suggestions in the comments)

Thanks
And hope to hear from you soon.
TERP UNION